Access to add and change pages is restricted. See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Wiki+access

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 47 Next »

Introduction

This survey has been designed to collect information and feedback from all Apache OFBiz Committers.It was sent out to all Committers, including non active and emeritus (a total of 38). The information gathered will be used to help understand if there are any areas where help and support is needed, and also to give Committers an opportunity to highlight any points they see as important that may not have yet come up for discussion on the mailing lists.

Survey Details:

  • It was conducted over the period 19th - 25th May 2016. Details of the survey was posted on the mailing lists.
  • A total of 24 responses were recorded and the details are recorded below.

Survey Catchment

Statistics were captured about the Committer status.

  • The majority of respondents were active Committers
  • Non of our emeritus Committers responded

Response Frequency

The survey was open for a total of 7 days (19th - 25th May 2016).

  • The majority of responses were recorded during the first day
  • Although the majority of responses were within the first 2 days, leaving the survey open for the additional days and sending out reminders did increase the total number of responses.
  • If another survey is done, then it the default duration would be 7 days.

 

Survey Questions

Question 1: How long have you been an Apache OFBiz Committer?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
1-3 Years54%13
3-5 Years4%1
Over 5 Years42%10
   

Comments :

  • The objective of this question was to find out the profile of the Committers participating in the survey
  • The question was phrased specifically to identify newer Committers and more experienced ones.
  • Only one response was allowed.

Conclusions :

  • The project invites new Committers regularly so I would expected that the numbers would be fairly balanced across each duration but this is not the case.
  • This question has highlighted that there is we have a lot of new and experienced Committers but not many in between.
  • This discrepancy could have been caused by the fact we have missing data (14 out of the 38 Committers sent the survey did not respond)

Question 2: Are you a Committer on any other Apache projects?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
Yes4%1
No96%23
   

Comments :

  • The objective of this question was to find out if a Committer needed to share their time with another Apache project
  • Only one response was allowed

Conclusions :

  • The results show that only 1 of our respondents is a Committer on another Apache project and the majority are only Committers on OFBiz
  • With Groovy and Freemarker now Apache projects, I would have expected that some of the Committers would be shared across these two other Apache projects.
  • Perhaps a future question could capture if Committers are contributors (rather than Committers) on another Apache project

Question 3: Which of the following best describes how you see yourself?

 

 

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
I'm very active and I contribute often17%4
I'm active but don't contribute as often as I would like to54%13
I'm active but haven't contributed for a while8%2
I'm not active and would like to be more active13%3
I'm not active and am no longer involved with the project4%1
None of the above4%1
   

Comments :

  • The objective of this question was to find out how Committers see their activity level
  • It was phrased to cater for inactive or emeritus Committers but also gave an option for inactive Committers who wanted to become more active

Conclusions :

  • The results show that the  biggest group were the Committers that would like to contribute more frequently.
  • One unexpected result was that there 3 Committers that see themselves as currently inactive that wanted to be more active. (Note: This included committers that are currently classed as active as well as inactive)
  • A positive finding is that one of the inactive Committers would like to be more active. This means that even though Committers have not been involved in the project for a while, they may still want to be able to come back and contribute.

Question 4: How often do you make commits to the Apache OFBiz repository?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
Often (once a week or more)13%3
Sometimes (less than once a week)33%8
Rarely (less than once a month)38%9
I dont do commits anymore13%3
None of the above4%1
   

Comments :

  • The objective of this question was to get a measure of the commit activity for a Committer.
  • Note that this is not a concrete measure because a Committer could still be contributing by testing, providing feedback and responses as part of another patch or commit

Conclusions :

  • The majority of Committers are not commiting often.
  • This could be caused by the type of work being done (e.g a re-factoring task may take longer because of the additional testing and checking that needs to be done to ensure that nothing is broken due to the re-factor), also some patches that are being applied are older which means that they may need to be fixed before they can be committed

Question 5: Which of the following best describes your commit activity?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
I mainly create, test and commit my own patches38%9
I mainly watch for patches from others to test and commit25%6
I'm not doing many commits at the moment13%3
I mainly test and provide feedback on patches4%1
None of the above21%5
   

Comments :

  • The objective of this question was to find out what was the main source of a Committer's activity.
  • It was phrased to cater for inactive Committers, as well as those who provided feedback and advice instead of doing regular commits

Conclusions :

  • The majority of committers focus on creating and applying their own patches which is something I would have expected.
  • It was very interesting to see that there is a group of committers that generally watch out for patches that contributors have uploaded and focus on testing and committing them.
  • There were 5 committers that did not fit any of the answer categories whichi is significant. I think a future survey should try and capture this missing categories (or categories)

Question 6:  Do you generally contribute to areas that are relevant to your work?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
Yes71%17
No29%7
   

 

Comments :

Conclusions :

 

 

Question 7:  What would make you more active as an Apache OFBiz Committer?

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
Nothing, I'm as active as I want to be29%7
Having more space time63%15
Having a defined workload so I know what needs to be done0%0
Being able to work as part of a team with another Committer or Community member4%1
None of the above4%1
   

Comments :


The objective of this question was to find out what, if anything was stopping Committers being more active

Conclusions :



The majority of Committers chose having more spare time as the key to being more active. This in fact ties in with question 3 where the majority of Committers said that they didn't contribute as often as they would like to.

Question 8: Please respond the following statements

 

 

 Strongly Disagree DisagreeNeither Disagree nor AgreeAgreeStrongly AgreeTotalWeighted Average
The community expects Committers to fix any reported problems immediately212370243.38
Being a Committer is difficult because you can only work on OFBiz in your spare time15891242.83
Committers are sometimes unsure of which areas to focus on031092242.58
Committers are only expected to be active on a project for a fixed time then they leave and move onto something else411540243.63
It would improve things if newer Committers were mentored by a more experienced one009114242.21
        
Answer ChoicesStrongly Disagree DisagreeNeither Disagree nor AgreeAgreeStrongly AgreeTotal
The community expects Committers to fix any reported problems immediately8%50%13%29%0%24
Being a Committer is difficult because you can only work on OFBiz in your spare time4%21%33%38%4%24
Committers are sometimes unsure of which areas to focus on0%13%42%38%8%24
Committers are only expected to be active on a project for a fixed time then they leave and move onto something else17%46%21%17%0%24
It would improve things if newer Committers were mentored by a more experienced one0%0%38%46%17%24
       

 

Comments :


Conclusions :

 

Question 9: What do you think would help improve the project? Please rank these in order of importance

 

 

Answer ChoicesRank 1Rank 2Rank 3Rank 4Rank 5Rank 6Score
Having More Committers11246102.21
Having a more structured and defined workplan4755214.13
Improving quality by cleaning and tidying up the existing codebase10522324.46
Better documentation68352 04.46
Keeping up to date with trends and technology by adding new features and improvements11114433.25
Separating out the framework into a distinct product2214782.5
        

Comments :


  • The objective of this question was to find out what each Committer thought was the most important out of the selections
  • The question was a ranking one, where the most important was ranked as '1' and the least at '6'

NOTE: Jacques highlighted that an answer choice was missing  - that of the project historic 'technical debt' that needs to be addressed.

 

Conclusions:

Question 10: Would you be willing to participate in future OFBiz Committer surveys?

 

 

Answer ChoicesPercentageNo. Responses
Yes96%23
No0%0
Perhaps4%1
   

 

Comments:

The objective of this question was to find out what the Committers would be willing to take part in future surveys.

 

 

Conclusions:

Normally this type of question gives only 2 options (Yes / No). I added the additional option to give more choice, especially if a non active or emeritus committers

Final Comments

Please note that participation in this survey was completely voluntary. None of our Committers were under any obligation to respond to the survey. I'm happy that a majority of them did and that we were able to capture this valuable information.

 

  • No labels