This page is meant as a template for writing a KIP. To create a KIP choose Tools->Copy on this page and modify with your content and replace the heading with the next KIP number and a description of your issue. Replace anything in italics with your own description.
Status
Current state: Draft
Discussion thread: here [Change the link from the KIP proposal email archive to your own email thread]
JIRA: KAFKA-7722
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).
Motivation
The ProducerPerformance tool is the standard for benchmarking Kafka producer send performance. The tool uses sampling and Java’s System.currentTimeMillis() to record latencies and provide percentiles at the end of each run. This method works well in most cases but results in a lack of precision.
This is a problem in low-latency environments in which sending a message takes at most a couple milliseconds. For example, if a user wants to run a benchmark test comparing two different Kafka cluster setups, it is hard to compare results if low latency values are observed.
Example:
Benchmark #1: average latency = 2 ms
Benchmark #2: average latency = 3 ms
Since System.currentTimeMillis() gives values with millisecond precision:
- A result of 2 ms can have a true value between [1.5, 2.5) before rounding
- A result of 3 ms can have a true value between [2.5, 3.5) before rounding
If we want to calculate the increase in latency observed, then we have a big spread of either:
- (1) Smallest spread: 2.5-(2.5) or ~0, resulting in approximately ~0% increase in latency
- (2) Largest spread: (3.5)-1.5 or ~2, resulting in approximately 2/2 or ~100% increase in latency
This means we cannot effectively compare these two benchmark results as the latency in #2 is anywhere from 0 to 100% higher than in #1, which is a big spread and results in very different implications.
Public Interfaces
Briefly list any new interfaces that will be introduced as part of this proposal or any existing interfaces that will be removed or changed. The purpose of this section is to concisely call out the public contract that will come along with this feature.
A public interface is any change to the following:
Binary log format
The network protocol and api behavior
Any class in the public packages under clientsConfiguration, especially client configuration
org/apache/kafka/common/serialization
org/apache/kafka/common
org/apache/kafka/common/errors
org/apache/kafka/clients/producer
org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer (eventually, once stable)
Monitoring
Command line tools and arguments
- Anything else that will likely break existing users in some way when they upgrade
Proposed Changes
Describe the new thing you want to do in appropriate detail. This may be fairly extensive and have large subsections of its own. Or it may be a few sentences. Use judgement based on the scope of the change.
Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan
- What impact (if any) will there be on existing users?
- If we are changing behavior how will we phase out the older behavior?
- If we need special migration tools, describe them here.
- When will we remove the existing behavior?
Rejected Alternatives
If there are alternative ways of accomplishing the same thing, what were they? The purpose of this section is to motivate why the design is the way it is and not some other way.